|
|
| |
|
| |
| |
Week
ending 04 November 2004
|
|
|
| |
Drug
deal good for NHS and pharma industry
| |
A deal struck with the Association
of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI)
will save the NHS £1.8bn over the next
five years and give pharma companies cash for
R&D.
Health
Secretary John Reid announced
that under the new Pharmaceutical Price Regulation
Scheme (PPRS):
- the NHS will get a 7 per cent discount
on branded medicines for the next five years,
saving £370m a year
- pharma companies will not have to pay
tax on 23 per cent of sales to the NHS if
they put the money back into research in
Britain. Companies will also be given incentives
to develop medicines for children — which
has been a major concern in recent months
The NHS will put the savings back into frontline
services, according to the Health Secretary.
It comes into effect on 1 January 2005 and
applies only to companies with NHS sales above £1m.
This last came after smaller ABPI members pressured
the organisation to get them a better deal.
Companies can also modulate prices — that
is, make different reductions to products so
they offer an overall price cut of 7 per cent.
The ABPI describes the deal as being 'imposed
on the pharma industry' and the institute's
president Vincent Lawton complained:
'The price cut is unnecessary given the fact
that medicines prices have fallen in real terms
by some 15 per cent over the past 10 years
and that the NHS's medicines budget is remaining
steady at about 12 per cent of expenditure.'
However, the ABPI is still encouraging members
to accept the voluntary scheme as being the
best available. It lists the benefit as:
- continued freedom of individual medicines
pricing within the scheme's overall constraints
- stability for at least the next five years
- applying to the whole of the UK as the
single price control mechanism
- continued recognition of and support for
the pharma industry's R&D investment
The deal was negotiated over the last nine
months. The aims of PPRS — negotiated
every five years — are to:
- secure provision of safe and effective
medicines for the NHS at reasonable prices
- promote a strong and profitable pharmaceutical
industry capable of sustained R&D, leading
to future availability of improved medicines
- encourage efficient and competitive development
and supply of medicines to pharmaceutical
markets in this and other countries
|
|
|
RCN
highlights nursing shortage
| |
The NHS relies too heavily
on agency nurses and nurses from overseas,
a report has shown.
An ageing workforce and more nurses leaving
the profession (many to work abroad), has led
to the Royal College of Nursing (RCN) titling
their annual nursing labour review Fragile
future?
Since 2000, the nursing and midwifery workforce
has grown by 16 per cent (to 292,00), outstripping
government targets. However, this has mainly
been achieved through the recruitment of foreign
nurses and casual staff. During the same period,
the use of temporary nursing staff went up
by 36 per cent.
The report makes the following warnings:
- One in 10 nurses leave the NHS annually — approximately
30,000 a year. A 1 per cent reduction would
mean that around 3,000 NHS nurses could be
retained.
- One in four nurses have been recruited
from overseas.
- The nursing workforce is increasingly
ageing, with more than a quarter (27 per
cent) of registered nurses now aged over
50.
- Both British and overseas nursing staff
are being targeted by an American recruitment
drive. 2,000 nurses left the NHS for America
in 2003 — the largest figure on record.
- Plans to improve the care of older people
are being hampered by the shortage of district
nurses.
Dr Beverly Malone, general secretary of the
RCN said:
‘Whilst the RCN acknowledges the numbers
of nurses has increased, my concern is that
the foundations of nursing are built on sand,
not stone. We have to ask why so many nurses
feel unable to commit to the NHS and prefer
to work on a temporary basis? Nurses tell us
that the chance to choose which hours they
work is a major factor. We want employers to
do more with better flexible working arrangements
to significantly improve retention.’
Health
Secretary John Reid has denied
there is a crisis in nursing. Speaking on Radio
4's Today programme, Mr Reid said the NHS has
80,000 more nurses than in 1997, and that 18,500
nurses have returned to the profession in the
last four years. He also said that reliance
on agency staff was being reduced.
|
|
|
Progress
update on NSF for older people
| |
A report on progress in the
older people’s national service framework
(NSF) calls for more to be done to tackle bed
blocking and improve hospital discharge care.
Professor Ian Philp, the national director
for older people’s services (more commonly
know as the older people’s tsar), has
authored the report Better health in old
age. Despite the calls and warnings of
dealing with an increasingly aging population,
Professor Philp does claim that real progress
has been made and that older people’s
health is getting better.
Achievements are highlighted in the NSF target
areas of preventing age discrimination and
developing services for stroke, mental health
and falls.
Paul Cann, Help the Aged’s director
of policy and research, said ‘the NSF
for older people has been hugely significant
in modernising attitudes towards older people.’
|
|
|
Wales:
New standards to slash red tape
| |
Health
Minister Jane Hutt has announced
a consultation into simplifying healthcare
standards in Wales.
The aim is to replace the current complicated
set of standards by which healthcare in Wales
is inspected. They will form the basis of how
providers report to Healthcare Inspectorate
Wales.
The new standards apply to:
- providers of healthcare
- health managers
- commissioners
- patients
- independent and voluntary sector
The consultation finishes in the new year.
|
|
|
Allergy
sufferers suffer on the NHS
| |
The NHS is failing millions
of allergy sufferers, MPs have claimed.
The condition is not being diagnosed and GPs
have little information about treatment options,
says the all-party Commons Health Committee.
It commented that sometimes, sufferers 'had
only been referred to one after they had consulted
an allergy charity and armed themselves with
the names of relevant consultants and units.'
The report also criticised the shortage of
such allergy clinics in the UK. There are just
six in England — none west of Bournemouth
or north of Manchester.
It goes on to damn poor regulation of testing
services outside the NHS, claiming that the
inquiry 'has illustrated that the use of expensive
and often useless tests creates considerable
unnecessary expense and worry for patients
and may also place them at risk.'
PCT managers did not escape the wrath of the
report. It accused them of failing to admit
that there was an epidemic of allergies, which
are believed to affect 30 per cent of adults
and 40 per cent of children.
The report acknowledges that where symptoms
are not readily controlled they require repeat
consultations and long-term medication, incurring
high costs for the NHS.
The report accuses the Department of Health
of burying its head in the sand by claiming
that a lack of demand for allergy services
indicates that there is no unmet demand:
'It is not possible for doctors to refer patients
to services where none are available. Further,
there is no mechanism to measure this unmet
need. Patients themselves will often not be
aware of specialist services and are often
in any case not properly diagnosed. The accounts
we have received from hundreds of patients
demonstrate the frustration felt by individuals
over the difficulties in securing appropriate
treatment, and over the lengthy waits and long
journeys they are experiencing.'
Recommendations include:
- a primary care allergy network
- clinical quality markers for allergy
- training for GPs and endorsement of GPs
with special interest in allergies
- more allergy clinics — one in each
of the old NHS regions
- each allergy clinic to have specialists
in adult and child allergies
- independent diagnostic services to be
inspected by the Healthcare Commission
- better information about allergies for
patients, professionals and managers
|
|
|
Hospitals
face shortage as doctors migrate to general practice
| |
A&E departments are suffering a staffing
crisis as doctors move over to general practice,
the British Medical Association (BMA) has warned.
In the last year as many as 62 per cent of
A&E units have lost a staff grade doctor
to general practice. The concerns will be raised
at the BMA conference in Edinburgh on 8 November,
by Mr Mohib Khan, chair of the BMA’s
staff and associate specialist (SAS) committee.
The association surveyed 138 hospitals and
found that:
- SAS doctors make up about half of A&E
staff
- seven in ten A&E departments had vacancies
for staff grade doctors
- three quarters of those interviewed complained
about inequality of pay between A&E doctors
and other medical staff
- SAS doctors often face bullying, which
is cited by many as a source of stress. Mr
Khan says they are assigned demeaning and
inappropriate tasks, denied career progression,
and refused access to training
Mr Mohib Khan claims that staffing problems
will worsen unless the NHS reduces pay disparities
and raises morale among this type of doctor.
Health
minister John Hutton responded,
telling BBC News: 'It is nonsense to suggest
that there is a crisis in recruitment and retention
in A&E departments.
'Since 1997, there has been a 50 per cent
increase in the number of associate specialists
in A&E together with a 55 per cent increase
in A&E consultants.
'Because of the increase in the number of
doctors and nurses more patients are being
seen more quickly in NHS A&E departments
than ever before.'
|
|
|
|
|
|