Healthcare
Commission
<
Influencers contents | Print
this page
Reviews
of PCTs
The first pilot
clinical governance reviews of PCTs were completed in 2002. Many
more have now been completed. These early PCT pilots included North
Peterborough, Hillingdon, Fenland and Central Manchester PCTs. These
are among the longer established PCTs, yet the Commission for Health
Improvement (now known as the Healthcare Commission) raised concerns
about both commissioning and management capacity.
The reviews
also exposed an interesting issue. Chris Town, then chief executive
of North Peterborough PCT, expressed concerns over the levels of
responsibility CHI expected PCTs to have, for such issues as health
and safety in GP practices:
‘GPs are
independent. You can’t expect to have that level of control
for the day-to-day running of a practice’, he commented. In
a world of managed primary care, government might indeed want PCTs
to do just this.
Feedback from
the evaluation of these has been used to refine the review methods,
now being rolled out to all PCTs. NHS influencers will need to view
the results of these at www.healthcarecommission.org.uk.
In terms of the wider performance management of PCTs, like the acute
trusts, PCTs were star rated for the first time in summer 2003.
It is important for NHS influencers to be aware of the rating of
their PCTs.
The pilot indicators
used fell into three groups:
- Improving
health contained seven indicators that look at deaths from circulatory
diseases, people who had quit smoking for four weeks, patients
vaccinated against flu and some sexual health measures
- Access to
quality services included inpatient and outpatient waits
- Service
provision looked at issues such as emergency readmissions for
chronic conditions, primary care management of chronic conditions
and the prescribing levels of generic drugs and antibacterial
drugs.
|